Skip to primary navigation | Skip to secondary navigation | Skip to content | Skip to footer
Problems viewing this site
Access keys | Skip to primary navigation | Skip to secondary navigation | Skip to content | Skip to footer |
Problems viewing this site
Home > Share your knowledge > Resources > INSPIRE > July 2006 > Feature Topic

Feature Topic

Using Socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines, National Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, 2003

Taken as a whole, the evidence on socioeconomic status and health in Australia is unequivocal: those who occupy positions at lower levels of the socioeconomic hierarchy fare significantly worse in terms of their health. Specifically, persons variously classified as ‘low’ socio-economic status have higher mortality rates for most major causes of death, their morbidity profile indicates that they experience more ill-health (both physiological and psychosocial), their illness is more likely to be chronic and treatment needs complex, and their use of health care services suggests that they are less likely to act to prevent disease or detect it at an asymptomatic stage.

In response the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has prepared a handbook explicitly acknowledging the relationship between socioeconomic position (SEP) and health inequalities, and setting out methods to identify and incorporate socio-economic evidence into the development of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs). The application of the framework will assist in the development of CPGs which:

The framework presents a logical four step process that begins with the identification of the required health decisions, leads into specific questions for the literature search and results in recommendations to incorporate evidence on SEP and health into CPGs.

  1. Identify the health decisions required
  2. Search the literature for evidence that, due to SEP, population subgroups may experience barriers to and/or have limited capacity or opportunities to achieve equal health gains
  3. Search the literature to identify interventions that address barriers and/or opportunities to achieving equal health gains
  4. Synthesise evidence from Steps 2 and 3 and current clinical best-practice evidence to develop recommendations

The framework shows that using the literature to identify and address the barriers to achieving equitable health gains is an essential step in the process of developing practice/ service/intervention guidelines. By addressing these factors at the outset, decision-making becomes a fully informed and participatory process, leading to improved health gains.

This document is available in full at http://www7.health.gov.au/nhmrc/publications/synopses/cp89syn.htm

Top of page
Last updated 13 July 2006